Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conspiracy theories against atheism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 21:29, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Conspiracy theories against atheism

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I don't precisely understand the intended scope of this article, but it is meaningless whatever the intention is. It's just two brief, grammatically flawed sentences with no references or indication of any kind of notability of these conspiracy theories. Fences &amp;  Windows  23:31, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Was just about to nominate. Nonsensical original research. Christopher Connor (talk) 23:35, 16 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conspiracy theories-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:02, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions.  --  Fences  &amp;  Windows  00:03, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Don't delete this article, it's under construction and more information will be added. It's at the moment incomplete just cause i want other people to contribute to the article i've already marked. Already there's another article on Obama's religion as a conspiracy theory. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Themastertree (talk • contribs) 01:45, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Another original research festival. Carrite (talk) 02:59, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Failure to differentiate atheism, secularism and humanism means content irrelevant. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:33, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete agree with editors' reasons above--Utinomen (talk) 23:25, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete original research, reads like a personal essay. Dramedy Tonight (talk) 02:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.