Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constance M. Rockosi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

Constance M. Rockosi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG and WP:ACADEMIC. I can't find any evidence of notability. She is only doing her job. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 11:18, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep clear case of nominator failing to do WP:BEFORE. Why would you have nominated this within hours of creation without doing a modicum of checking on notability? Noted scientist, one of the heads of The Sloan Digital Sky Survey who has been cited as an expert numerous times by others in her field., with a string of publications  and she is "chair" of her department . Not only does she meet ACADEMIC she clearly meets GNG. SusunW (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * I withdraw my nomination to Keep per sources provided by . The second source provided is a clear pass of WP:ACADEMIC. Trout slap to me! Wikic¤l¤gyt@lk to M£ 16:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.