Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constance Welch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pilot (Supernatural). Given that Character is not mentioned in Characters of Supernatural. Any relevant content can be merged from history,  Sandstein   06:48, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Constance Welch

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is about a character who appears in just one episode of a TV series, that in no way meets notability guidelines. Article just contains plot-only information, trivia, and in-universe details. The only real world information is a bit about casting. There's no reason this information just can't be put into Supernatural (season 1) or Characters of Supernatural. Again, this is a character who appears in one episode; it's not a notable recurring or main character from the series. Drovethrughosts (talk) 13:30, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Characters of Supernatural per nom.PohranicniStraze (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pilot (Supernatural). There's far too much to merge everything, and none of it is sourced. The important details are all in the article on the episode. (If someone wants to do a selective merge to Characters of Supernatural, just a small section, that would be ok too.) --Colapeninsula (talk) 14:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into Characters of Supernatural as per nom, not notable character.  Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:45, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:57, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Merge or Redirect?
 * Redirect to Pilot (Supernatural) seems more appropriate as she is a one-time character that is already covered in the article on the relevant episode. I do not see the value of adding a section about her in the characters list when she is extremely minor and a merge into the list would primarily be repeated information already found in the pilot article. I argue that the information on her should be contained in the article on the relevant episode. Aoba47 (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric  05:55, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. I oppose a redirect; it's entirely possible that there's a real notable person by this name. Josh Milburn (talk) 00:17, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * That's not grounds for deletion without a redirect, and doesn't appear to accord with any policy. Should we not have redirects for any fictional character on the basis that there might be a real person with the same name? --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 02:58, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Do you oppose a redirect? That sort of comment (or non-comment) isn't much help. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Comment: I agreed with the views of the nomination and felt it was appropriate to delete, but having said that, I don't have any objections to a redirect instead. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 00:56, 25 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.