Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constantian Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 02:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

Constantian Society
Substub on utterly non-notable fringe political group. Statement "It cannot be determined whether the society has been active since 1997" gives you an idea of its influence. Fishal 07:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep American Monarchists are probably always going to be a fringe political group, but the movement does exist, and fringe doesn't automatically equal non-notable. The fact that the group hasn't been active since 1997 doesn't really do it for me either -- historical politics can be encyclopedic.  I see 2790 Ghits for the group, (admittedly a lot from what appear to be "monarchist" websites.)  They apparently publish a journal, which means both their existence and the substance of their views are verifiable.  Monarchism, as a movement, is rather outdated, but hardly non-notable (as many monarchies still exist worldwide.) Wikipedia has an article on Monarchism that lists modern pro-monarchy groups including this one.  Dina 17:05, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not a substub; it's clearly a stub. It's not terribly notable, but it is worthy of an article.--Prosfilaes 01:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Dina, so long as there is enough interest to expand. Metaspheres 11:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.