Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitution Party of Wisconsin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:43, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

Constitution Party of Wisconsin

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article only cites the official website and one source that says it exists. It does not appear to have any elected officers or any non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Any useful information can be folded into Constitution Party (United States). Toa Nidhiki05 11:11, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:17, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 11:17, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:27, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  PA TH   SL OP U  13:33, 12 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment. Recognition by the state as one of five recognized parties is at least a hint of notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 14:13, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Party recognition in Wisconsin basically entails getting a small number of signatures (around 10,000, which other organizations often help with) or any candidate for statewide office receiving 1% of the vote - a small number that does not inherently infer notability. It does not inherently infer notability - that takes significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. If there are no major elected officers (often third-party local officials are actually elected on a nonpartisan ballot, and then touted as elected officials), and no coverage of this specific state party, it’s not notable. <i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Toa</i> <i style="color: green; font-family: Mistral;">Nidhiki05</i> 15:03, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, unless covered in reasonable depth by reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Mere existence is not notable. Wikipedia reflects reality, and if (in reality) a minor political party is not considered worth covering by sources it should not be covered by Wikipedia. WP is not the venue to promote tiny political parties. Blueboar (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.