Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitution of Kosovo (1974)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Constitution of Kosovo until/unless the section on this topic is developed to a point where a WP:SPLIT from the main article seems appropriate. RL0919 (talk) 08:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Constitution of Kosovo (1974)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Very short WP:REDUNDANTFORK with identical content as Constitution of Kosovo. None other federal units of the former SFR Yugoslavia have separate articles for their 1974 constitutions, and so shouldn't Kosovo, because all of them are coverable within 1974 Yugoslav Constitution and History sections on their individual successor country articles. Vipz (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Law, Kosovo,  and Yugoslavia. Vipz (talk) 18:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Unless someone can show potential to expand further, simply redirect it back to where it was copied out of. It's a plausible redirect so I don't know why we had to go to AfD for this. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 15:50, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment -- It seems to me that this article is misnamed. It might be called The status of Kosovo under the 1974 Constitution of Yugoslavia.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)


 * :Hello. As the creator of the article, if it is necessary, I appreciate renaming the article more than deleting it. All the arguments I have attached to the article as references, I think it would be good to add one or two sources in the Serbo-Croatian language. All the best. Drenisa (talk) 21:32, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:42, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Just to mention that in other wikis we have Ustav NR Hrvatske from 1947] & Ustav NR Srbije from 1947, etc ... In the future, someone can create other articles about the constitutions of the Yugoslav republics and provinces and translate them into English. Than You.:Drenisa (talk) 11:13, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Drenisa I hoped somebody else would reply to you instead of me, so you don't accuse me again of having something personal against you. That said, I've not disputed verifiability nor sourcing for the content, all that is great. It is a question of necessity for having short copies of something that can and already is fully covered in a section of another article. Therefore, no content is being deleted. Other Wikipedia editions operate separately from English Wikipedia and have their own policies. Furthermore, the former link you've provided is a link to (Croatian) Wikisource, and I'm pretty sure you could create articles about individual republic and province constitutions on English Wikisource if you so wish, then link it on Constitution of Kosovo using Wikisource. -Vipz (talk) 00:30, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 00:00, 11 December 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment (or perhaps, Speedy Keep) - It seems clear that some editing result should occur here, but as per Joy &#91;shallot&#93; I can't see why deletion would be an appropriate outcome. The nomination reason given was WP:REDUNDANTFORK, but the appropriate remedy here is to WP:MERGE or to open a request for comment. Suriname0 (talk) 15:38, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge to Constitution of Kosovo. Without a more thorough evaluation of the non-English sources, it seems most plausible that this current text does not meet the summary style threshold to warrant splitting from the parent article, so merge it back and incubate there. czar  07:36, 25 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.