Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitutional legitimacy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 05:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Constitutional legitimacy
I cannot understand what this page is meant to achieve. The first sentence is completely self-referential; the rest of the article gets nowhere. Ths question is good one, but is adequately covered in a myriad of better articles. This almost reads as the opening paragraph in a politics/philosophy essay that never got finished. Emeraude 14:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a substantial topc in constitutional law and legal philosophy, as is evident from a glance at the Google results. The stub is poor, but not so much so that deletion is warranted. A redirect might also work, if a suitable target is found. Sandstein 16:55, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - the current article reads like a possible promo for Barnett's book, but the topic is worthy. I would say that since the topic goes to the legitimacy of the foundation of a national law, it is very important and should be given plenty of time to grow. ENeville 22:51, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * MergeWith the article about the book. This adds nothing to what is there.Edison 23:06, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable. Everyking 07:55, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep and completely rewrite (leaving no byte unchanged) &mdash; the subject is very notable, the article as it stands is useless ➥the Epopt 02:00, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.