Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constitutional rights of pregnant inmates


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Incarceration of women. Selective merge; see the discussion for guidance on what material should be merged. After the merge, redirect. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Constitutional rights of pregnant inmates

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:NOTESSAY, and it seems that a majority of the aforementioned article was created using original research. OhKayeSierra (talk) 21:21, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and Merge information into Incarceration of women There is some interesting information here, but makes a great point, as the article's title and prose feel like an essay. Bkissin (talk) 21:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 01:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Merge as above, but the first portion only, given the other ~75% doesn't read like a wikipedia article should do (and yes, reads like an essay/academic report). There may be future scope for a proper article here, though the title doesn't make reference to the content being USA-specific. Bungle (talk • contribs) 22:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge as above, should be part of other article. Davidgoodheart (talk) 04:17, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Rights of pregnant prisoners is definitely, definitely a distinct topic. The article style could use some work (eg. shorter summaries of Nelson and Boswell, removing "only" for POV) but this is keepable. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 01:31, 2 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.