Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construction Specialties, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Construction Specialties, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log )

NN company Aaabbccz  ( talk ) 18:24, 12 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Although it asserts to be an international company, the only sources in the article are primary. —C.Fred (talk) 18:30, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like a bit of disguised spam to me. It's not easy to show notability for a business (or person) operating in this sort of area, even though without them the architects and builders would be out on a limb. (Just as without some farmer somewhere growing spuds, the five star restaurant wouldn't be able to serve Duck Parmentier.) A difficulty in researching this company is that while they are 'Construction Specialties, Inc', there are many other companies with that in their names too, like Anchor Construction Specialties. It would seem that title has been speedied previously http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NawlinWiki/Archive_50&diff=405003017&oldid=404995342 The re-creation was by an SPA, the rest of the edits by another SPA. This always makes me think that this is designed to give an impression of numbers and general interest in the article. As opposed to it being probably one person from the company gaming the system - or trying to. I could be wrong. I suppose I could... Peridon (talk) 23:20, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Danger (talk) 06:17, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.