Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Construction document communication


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:40, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Construction document communication

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Another unreferenced WP:ESSAY about an "emerging area" of some field. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 21:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing to differentiate it from Document Management. No independant coverage. Looks like an advert.--Savonneux (talk) 23:23, 20 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. The article is an excuse to mention a website.  The author of the article would appear to be associated with said website based on the CCI appendage to the name stem and teh webs site is from Construction Connect, Inc. -- Whpq (talk) 13:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, spam: Construction Document Communication tools, such as www.BuilditLive.com, go beyond merely the management of documents. CDC applications not only centralize the most critical construction documents, such as drawings, specifications, schdules, change orders, and punch lists, but they also provide mechanisms where by a central 'site owner' can easily manage the invitation and permissions of all the users of the site. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:09, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.