Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consuelo Moreno-López


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. Nominator withdrew. Notability proven (being the oldest naturalized US citizen is apparently notable). - @pple complain 05:08, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Consuelo Moreno-López

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Article has existed in stub form for over 2 years. No assertion of notability and no sources. SmashvilleBONK! 00:24, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * delete, although people living >100 years are potentially notable, there is not enough evidence that she was widely noted, i.e., fails WP:BIO. `'Míkka>t 00:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. JJL 00:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: Too little context to assert notability (other than the 100+ age). - Rjd0060 05:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: If what this says is true, then the oldest person to become a naturalized U.S. citizen is definitely notable. This needs to be verified and mentioned in the article though -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 06:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - The length of time an article has been a stub is not a valid reason for deletion. Lack of sources is also not a valid reason for deletion. (It's the impossibility of finding and adding sources that's a valid deletion reason.) Amarrg has demonstrated that a valid source can be found. Rray 00:07, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Withdraw Nom. Apparently by the results of the other AfDs...being really old is enough to be included on Wikipedia. --SmashvilleBONK! 16:48, 16 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.