Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consultation (media)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Consultation (media)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I just don't believe that this a real thing of any notability. It only has one inbound link, and that doesn't seem to relate particularly to this article. Since it's creation in 2007 nothing of substance seems to have been added. Derek Andrews (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC) Derek Andrews (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Quite possibly WP:COATRACK/soapboxing for "Bordewijk and Kaam" from a largely SPA editor who also tried adding related text a while back to Allocution. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:38, 18 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.