Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumer economy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. John254 04:59, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Consumer economy

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Delete This stub is two years old, and seems unlikely ever to be useful.JQ 04:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep, the nominator's reasoning seems to be centered around the fact it is a stub. Which is not a good reason for deletion. Secondly, as the article itself states "As such, the subject is of special interest to economists". And from my experience I'd agree with that statement, which means I also strongly disagree with "unlikely ever to be useful". Mathmo Talk 21:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, very notable topic, with 100,000+ google hits for the term.  This term also appears in 700+ books  and nearly 2,000 results on Google Scholar . No shortage of reliable sources for this article. --Aude (talk) 01:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a critical topic in economics. --lquilter 01:59, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep The consumer economy is a major part of the economy in most developed countries. Shops, banks, credit cards, advertising, all depend on it. Nominator needs to read a newspaper sometime. I can't believe this is a stub. Totnesmartin 23:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.