Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Consumer species


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 22:44, 1 November 2005 (UTC)

Consumer species
Full of errors and redundant. The Famous Movie Director 00:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. - The Famous Movie Director 00:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. — ceejayoz talk [[Image:Flag_of_Australia.svg|24px]] 00:28, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Consumer species should probably redirect to Heterotroph. --TantalumTelluride 00:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Also, Producer species should probably redirect to Autotroph. I think the terms are synonymous. Someone with more knowledge of biology should comment. --TantalumTelluride 00:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. *drew 01:22, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect as per TantalumTelluride, if they are equivalent. Keep and cleanup, if they are not the same. -- Kjkolb 11:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with heterotroph, if terms are identical (they seem to be). Otherwise keep, AfD is not cleanup. Kappa 13:38, 25 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.