Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contact electrification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Triboelectric effect — as an editorial decision, this may be reversed at will, though it is preferable to seek consensus on the talk page beforehand. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 (t • c) 07:41, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Contact electrification

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This article currently consists of material all found in Triboelectric effect, after 's overhauls to the pages. The previous material is at, and I don't think there's enough material not covered by Triboelectric effect that we can source and salvage. Save for 1 and 2 all sources of that version are primary sources by a small group of people. Aaron Liu (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:53, 29 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete, changing to a redirect to Triboelectric effect.
 * Ldm1954 (talk) 02:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Merge as Talk said MICHAEL 942006 (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge anything useful and redirect to Triboelectric effect. Or keep. This is obviously a verifiable topic and a reasonable search term. The article has been around since 2004, almost 20 years. I'm neutral on whether the material here is better covered in Triboelectric effect or split out here into a separate article, but in any case deletion seems unwarranted. -- 17:07, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Oops, looks like I confused AfD's D for discussion instead of deletion. Aaron Liu (talk) 22:10, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries. Merges and/or redirects are usually discussed on the article's talk page. But some consider a redirect a kind of soft deletion, and if that is controversial among editors, it's reasonable to bring it to AfD. -- 18:05, 1 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.