Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contact high


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep per WP:SNOW. Bearian (talk) 02:27, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Contact high

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is unsourced, unable to find supporting material using Google search. Article is largely pop-culture references, the term itself appears to be urban legend. Steve CarlsonTalk 22:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nothing else to say, really.   SIS   23:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Common enough in psychology papers on drug use, e. g. here is Keup, Wolfram (1971) "The Vocabulary of the Drug User and Alcoholic: A Glossary", Substance Use & Misuse, 6, p. 353:"a psychogenic “trip” without taking drugs by being close to somebody while he is on drugs. Incorrectly for the high obtained by inhaling the smoke of other marijuana smokers". I've found several other mentions just from a couple of minutes looking at google scholar, mostly only tangential, as here: .   But it's clear that this is an old and well established term for a phenomenon which, real or imaginary, is discussed in scholarly literature. N p holmes (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep well known concept ,sourcable, though some of it may go a bit back in time to when people where just alking about these things 40 years ago. . Medicial literature, psychology, use in the creative arts and autobio. and criticism. Just decelop the article. DGG (talk) 09:14, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep as a very known phenomenon that is sourceable. The problems with the article can be addressed with tags, or better yet, edits.   D ENNIS B ROWN  (T) (C) 01:47, 17 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.