Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contactizer (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. While it is obviously preferable for available sources to be used in the article, it is generally only necessary to show that they exist in order to prevent the article's deletion (per WP:ATD and WP:IMPERFECT). Any unsourced statements in the article which are challenged can be removed until they can be sourced. -Scottywong | comment _ 17:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Contactizer
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

No 3rd party sources in the article indicating any sort of lasting notability. OSborn arfcontribs. 03:18, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:18, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  00:40, 4 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: Per the sources presented in the first AfD. SL93 (talk) 01:05, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are no third-party sources cited in the article to satisfy either WP:V or WP:GNG. After three weeks of AfD!  Sandstein   06:58, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.