Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemplative art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:25, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Contemplative art

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

I don't think the sources exist to write a neutral article on this topic Polarpanda (talk) 18:32, 6 December 2009 (UTC) I believe this catagory is not original and readily available using both a regular search (i.e., Google), as well as, a focused search within university libraries.Docob5 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete. The article appears to be primarily original research. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 18:42, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * weak delete Maybe someone can help the author of this page, I feel their heart was in the right place. Just not well presented in the main space. --  R. Mutt 1917    Talk  19:39, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Seems like WP:NEO to me. Angryapathy (talk) 17:45, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Various searches, esp. with Scholar, show that the phrase isn't used in any terminological way, but covers the spectrum of possible combinations of the two words. The one accessible reference doesn't say what is claimed for it and doesn't speak of a class of art as such. Mangoe (talk) 17:13, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.