Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemplative psychology


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep (nomination withdrawn; non-admin closure) JulesH (talk)

Contemplative psychology

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Original research essay Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 13:32, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy Keep It's obviously not an original research essay as it cites sources such as a book about the topic and is more of a stub than an essay. Some searching indicates that merger with transpersonal psychology may be the best way forward. Warden (talk) 15:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Mea culpa, it was unsourced when I nominated (perhaps a little too hastily). I'll let this run and see what others think. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 15:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * If you're doing NPP, please be aware that you're being watched to see how quickly you're pouncing on new articles. Patrolling from the back of the queue is preferred. Warden (talk) 15:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I prefer weeding out obvious crap at the front of the queue. Like everyone, I make mistakes sometimes. I'm not aware of any stipulation that "patrolling from the back" is preferred, though 4 minutes is probably too hasty, I admit. Basa lisk  inspect damage⁄berate 16:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.