Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary Art Galleries Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 03:26, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Contemporary Art Galleries Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Only claim for notability is that it awards two non notable awards. Fails WP:GNG. Theroadislong (talk) 22:24, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 07:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * It's vital to search for it under its French name. Even English-language media uses the French moniker, it seems. Based on these Gnews results, and the geographic distribution thereof, it's say it's adequately notable under WP:NONPROFIT. Keep Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:53, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Keep I disagree with the nominator that the only claim for notability is that it awards two non notable awards. The awards may not have their own article (yet), but they have received mentions in the general press, for example in La Presse (see here). But CAGA is also notable for the Papier Art Fair, which has also received coverage in the press, by the Montreal Gazette, another RS (see here). Then there was the Feature art fair, which has recived attention in the Globe and mail, for example. As it stands, these events may not yet warrant their own article, so bringing them all together in one article makes a lot of sense to me. Mduvekot (talk) 00:54, 15 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:17, 16 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep but possibly rename to "Association des Galeries d'Art Contemporain" if that's what its actual legal organizational name it.  Montanabw (talk) 19:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.