Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary Catholic music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No agruments for deletion aside from the nominator. The issue of what to merge into what can continue on the article's talk page. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Contemporary Catholic music

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as unreferenced since December 2006. Not sure that there's enough material to support an article separate from Contemporary Catholic liturgical music once all the WP:external links are stripped out. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment The liturgical article did not exist when I created this article. I do think there are likely differences between the two, but I don't know if I have a set view on this article as it stands now.--T. Anthony (talk) 00:14, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Yup, I noticed that was the sequence of events. I know there's a paragraph or two that deals specifically with music outside the liturgy, but even if we stripped the rest out, that would still be unreferenced. Maybe a subsection in Contemporary Christian music would be warranted? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * That could be fine.--T. Anthony (talk) 23:01, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge with Contemporary Christian music per above convo. Doesn't seem enough to warrant its own article, but a section in CCM would be useful.  JUJUTACULAR  | TALK 02:44, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks OK, if not great.  Could use some further work, and merging could be a good idea.  Content and references are enough to not delete.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge from Contemporary Catholic liturgical music - A merge seems appropriate to me, but this would be a more appropriate title.--Unionhawk Talk E-mail Review 16:49, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep -- both this and Contemporary Catholic liturgical music are acceptable articles as they stand (though as a Protestant I know little of the subject. However, the stub section/cross-refernece at the end might be better deleted and handled by having a "see also" capnote.  This might warrnat a name change perhaps Contemporary Catholic non-liturgical music.  Peterkingiron (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That title sounds a bit awkward to me -- I don't think we need to specify non-liturgical, as long as we link prominently to the liturgical article, and maybe provide a paragraph summary. (Oh, I pity the admin who has to make sense of this AfD...) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:20, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree. My rename suggestion is clumsy.  CAn you think of a better one?  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:23, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.