Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary Verse 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Lazulilasher (talk) 03:58, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Contemporary Verse 2
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not long enough and non-notable


 * Delete the magazine is only published to the City of Winnipeg. (From website) Whenaxis (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: Where does it say that? I see that it is published in Winnipeg, but that's not the same thing. On the contrary, it says that "CV2 is distributed to newsstands and readers across Canada, the United States and the rest of the big wide world.". The journal appears to have been running continuously for more than a quarter of a century, which suggests notability. DionysosProteus (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep established literary magazines deserve an article ... is the Winnipeg comment a joke?? Why does it matter where something is published? I can't remember why I started this article now - I probably found some reference to the magazinr somewhere and wanted to find out more about it, but Wikipedia didn't have anything. Of course the article hasn't progressed much since then! Certainly loads of room for improvement, but I think the essential nature of the notability stands. Stumps (talk) 05:42, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: How many copies does it distribute across the World, valuable information is not being inserted into the article, Contemporary Verse 2, why is it not? 64.231.192.93 (talk) 11:29, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:17, 9 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep--literary journals are notable, esp. if they've been running for that long (that's a feat). I wish the article were expanded. Drmies (talk) 02:48, 10 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.