Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contemporary culture- border hopping

POV, factually inaccurate, racist. Should this be speedy deleted? --G Rutter 07:19, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Part of a little vandalism spree by this IP, most of it racist in various ways and all the rest of it now reverted. Not a speedy under current policy, although IMO the only reason for this is that it's proved impossible to write a policy that would allow it without allowing other inappropriate speedies as well. So leave it as an orphan for five days, blank it if you like. Andrewa 12:09, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Done that now. --G Rutter 12:19, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: Personally, I'm working on a policy and page that might handle stuff like this sensitively. At any rate, there's no question that this should go. Geogre 13:50, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing ambiguous about this one. Antandrus 18:20, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Here's a link to the original substub rant if anyone's interested in seeing what was deleted. Delete, was clearly a candidate for  speedy deletion.  --Ardonik.talk 19:27, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Incurably POV.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 21:54, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Unambiguous delete (incurably POV) but not a speedy according to the current policy. (I've added it as an example for Geogre's proposed "Mediated Delete" process.) Rossami 20:58, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)