Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content commerce


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Content commerce

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

This article was created three years ago by an account with no other edits, and seems to be a pet concept of said editor. It has zero references, is fairly meandering, and doesn't really have a point, except something vaguely related to multimedia and the internet. It also hasn't been touched much since it was created, despite numerous tags. I can't figure out how this is notable on its own. Torchiest talk/contribs 13:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - essentially just a duplicate of e-commerce, and contains a lot of original research. Claritas §  13:54, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with nom. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 16:46, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares
 * Delete. not notable, not verifiable - I did a few searches for sources and did not find any at all. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 18:08, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:13, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Borderline patent nonsense: it's just a bunch of patter that doesn't say anything: Content commerce is the transaction of any form of content using online trasnfer. This includes, but is not limited to direct sale, spread term sale, syndication, subscription, video on demand, bidding, placement listing, voting, pay-per-view, photos, licensing, agents, ticketing, access to information, and online participation.  - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:31, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, I wanted to speedy delete this, but wasn't sure if it would qualify. Torchiest talk/contribs 22:02, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.