Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content guru


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 05:16, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Content guru

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article isn't backed up by independent sources, and upon a quick Google, I could not find much third-party coverage for this company. Furthermore, it appears that the author is a marketing consultant for the company. wctaiwan (talk) 09:17, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — —Tom Morris (talk) 11:53, 4 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete.  Another one.  Content Guru specialises in the field of Communications Integration which involves connecting different information and communications systems together so that they can interwork. Content Guru provides its solutions using cloud-based technology and uses a SaaS (Software-as-a-Service) delivery model. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I work for Cable and Wireless Worldwide and can reference to working collaboratibely on solutions with Content Guru in this field for over four years. They are a technology company who have been at the vanguard of "cloud" based technology and software as a service provision and deployment models. As a key intellectual property engine for our company they provide hosted multi media gateway engines that can do a variety of exciting propositions in the contact centre and mobility spaces. They are both innovative and collaborative and I can certainly verify the content and integrity of their entry.S100BEY (talk) 13:19, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - The sources appear to be marketing material, press releases and the like: nothing truly independent as is required by the WP:Notability policy. --Noleander (talk) 01:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.