Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content quilting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. This does not preclude including information about this, if verifiable, in another related article.  Sandstein  08:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Content quilting

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

"Content quilting" appears to be a new patent-pending technology. I can find no substantial references that include the term, indicating that it is not notable. At present, this seems to be a neologism. RichardOSmith (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete This article has no independent sources, and I could not find any independent sources for content quilting. This article does not meet Wikipedia's Internet notability guidelines. NJ Wine (talk) 21:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

If the problem with the page is the use of the term "Content Quilting" itself, I propose changing it to "In-page inspection and filtering", or something to the likes of this. Bottom line is that the Content Filtering page is incomplete without a reference to technologies that inspect and filter content within the webpage rather than only at the URL level, and this is what I was attempting to address. Content Quilting, while patent-pending, is a methodology that has been in the web filtering market for nearly 5 years, is an approach that can similarly be seen utilized to varying degrees by other companies such as lightspeed and bloxx, both of which, if I remember correctly also inspect within the page, and is a valid addition to the Content Filtering article. It is from this perspective that the Content Quilting page was opened. While term itself is not sourceable beyond Netspark.com, that simply indicates that the company has not run a PR blitz to generate numerous articles, etc. on the Quilting name itself, however the Content Filtering page is incomplete without a reference to such technologies. {Sminchom (talk) 07:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)}
 * Delete - I found zero hits online about this concept, searching both Google News and Bing. I'm not saying it doesn't exist; I just can't find any relevant sources to show that it's notable. Bearian (talk) 18:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.