Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continental Materials Corporation (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Continental Materials Corporation
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was previously kept as WP:LISTED, but it is not listed on the main board of the NYSE but a subsidiary board only. What press sources there are, seem to be only about 1 nonfatal accident  DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED as WP:LISTED is not automatic. There is no significant coverage of this company. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 11:55, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep the article currently has encyclopedic content and passes WP:GNG.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 19:52, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, it does not pass GNG. The only possible secondary source merely regurgitates the audited report from the company. The rest are primary sources, business profiles from Reuters and Yahoo, and some don't even mention Continental. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 21:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:50, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- an unremarkable company going about its business. The content is not encyclopedically relevant and rather routine: "settled lawsuit"; "manufactures products". At $100M in revenue, the company is relatively small for a public one, so I don't see indicators of notability or significance here. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:31, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947  08:24, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - References I can find consist of company-owned websites and standard business directory listings. Nothing notable.Glendoremus (talk) 06:16, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP. Probably a great company but not notable enough for an article. -- HighKing ++ 11:39, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   16:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.