Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contingent analysis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Cel e stianpower háblame 20:34, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Contingent analysis
This is an original concept, first to be mentioned by the owner of a small firm in an interview that is still to be published. See Talk:Contingent analysis for a discussion first before voting. - DocendoDiscimus 09:33, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nomination. Please, before you vote, read the talk pages and the reasoning behind the other votes. DocendoDiscimus 00:21, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Author admitted it was OR on talk page before deleting his edit. Fails on OR and crystal ballism. I can't find any record of Mr. Karp and the term is unknown in the world of financial analysis- google hits do not relate to stocks (and the concept is largely non sensical). --JJay 12:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but mention Karp only as reference at end, and make it less like advertising. --MacRusgail 17:04, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per JJay. MCB 18:45, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. -Walter Siegmund 03:25, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Discussion page onthe article makes it clear that this is OR and the author is trying to use WP to bolster the credentials of his analytics. Dottore So 09:27, 18 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NOR--Mpeisenbr 00:33, 19 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.