Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contingent work

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete --Allen3 talk July 9, 2005 14:20 (UTC)

Contingent work
This is a personal essay on a term that seems to be a technical neologism (aka jargon). Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 1 July 2005 18:17 (UTC)
 * Delete as an essay. - Lucky 6.9 1 July 2005 18:27 (UTC)
 * Either massive revision or delete. It is someone's homework. It might be useful to have an article on contingent work, but this is not in the right format, doesn't have the right content and doesn't have the right voice. My favorite sentence is "Non-standard work is any type of work that deviates from standard work." --Habap 1 July 2005 19:02 (UTC)
 * Weak keep - seems like a concept from the peer reviewed secondary literature. Desperately needs to go to WP:Cleanup Cutler July 1, 2005 19:05 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; this is tantamount to OR and definitely looks like an essay.-Splash July 2, 2005 01:49 (UTC)
 * Delete essay. JamesBurns 2 July 2005 04:24 (UTC)
 * Delete essay, if the term is useful, re-direct to permatemp SchmuckyTheCat 2 July 2005 04:53 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.