Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Continuity errors in King of the Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 08:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

Continuity errors in King of the Hill

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

nn trivia fancruft that was forked off a main article. Much of it is pure OR and speculation anyway. Biggspowd 21:00, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There's really nothing here worth saving.  It looks to be entirely original research.  If any of it can be cited to a DVD commentary track or an interview, then it may have a place in the main article, but other than that, delete. -Chunky Rice 21:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, as triviacruft, but maybe some of the better points could be merged into a section on the main King of the Hill article. Useight 21:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Golfcam 21:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete If this needs to be mentionned, better mention it in King of the Hill, or if there is an article in the TV Wiki.--JForget 22:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete massive amounts of trivia are not what we need. Any notable info should go in the original article.  Giggy  UCP 23:55, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That is it. Now those overseas sweatshop animators only get one five minute break per 12 hour shift. ~ Infrangible 01:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced listcuftian criticism per all of the above. Bearian 02:08, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete &mdash; This article does not seem appropriate for Wikipedia and I don't believe it will be read by many people either. Cedars 03:16, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as trivia, junk, cruft. hard disks are not that cheap. such dross wastes the time of other editors. --Jack Merridew 10:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete pure trivia and an encyclopedia is not the place for analysis Corpx 02:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above and nom. Not relevant or notable enough for own article, should be merged with specific KOTH episodes.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 23:56, 22 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.