Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ContractZen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:04, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

ContractZen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable, PROMO puffpiece ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Finland. Shellwood (talk) 12:35, 22 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails NCOMPANY. Sources are unreliable. Notability is seemingly inherited from other companies incl. PwC and Ingram Micro. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 12:47, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Newsdesk and a Microsoft PR piece aren't RS nor helpful in establishing notability. The rest seem to tangentially mention this company. Agree with PROMO. Oaktree b (talk) 23:23, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete blatantly promotional. Partofthemachine (talk) 23:59, 22 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not seeing truly independent coverage even in Finnish sources. There's some hits, but it's all press releases etc. authored by the company itself. -Ljleppan (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: also didn't find much. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:29, 25 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.