Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contractor management


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Oops...hit the delete button :P SarahStierch (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

Contractor management

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Speedy contested. This resembles an essay and would at least need a complete rewrite with relvant references. All these activities are just a subset of managing a company and it's not clear that this is a discrete topic. The references cited are general safety references which apply to both contractors and direct employees. Wtshymanski (talk) 16:55, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 19:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)   I, Jethrobot  drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 19:19, 22 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep It is our policy to improve weak articles, not to delete them. As an example of a source which might be used for such work, see Outsourcing and Human Resource Management. Warden (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep:Improve. It wold be nice to think that is the "general policy" but I have seen far too much otherwise Colonel. --Iconoclast.Horizon (talk) 04:56, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.