Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contrived certainty

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. CDC  (talk)  21:27, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Contrived certainty
Neologism and/or original research Denni &#9775; 00:21, 2005 May 21 (UTC)
 * Delete or Speedy This is part of the Mythrandia/Serapion vandalism/nonsense spree of the past couple days. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 01:27, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Patent nonsense, neologism. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 06:19, 21 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable neologism, 10 googles (7 distinct), (and article doesn't make sense). RJFJR 19:47, May 21, 2005 (UTC)
 * Concur with RJFJR -- does not make sense. --Simon Cursitor 07:39, 23 May 2005 (UTC)
 * delete this gibberish. Irpen 06:37, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with RJFJR above. DES 16:31, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.