Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controlocracy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century. Joyous! Noise! 19:04, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Controlocracy

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Clearly doesn't pass WP:GNG, WP:DICDEF applies here. Given lack of sources, I'd also go for WP:NOTNEO on this one - one man's use of a word doesn't a word make. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and Norway. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:37, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Weak Delete per WP:NEO. I only see a few mentions in RS, but it's not the primary topic, except for the opinion piece in Modern Diplomacy.  APK  whisper in my ear  07:41, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO. 〜 Festucalex  •  talk  10:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The South China Morning Post seems to use the word often enough ( as an example), as does the Guardian . Oaktree b (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
 * And quite a few hits in Gscholar using the term, seems ok-ish. Oaktree b (talk) 19:50, 10 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge to The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century. All the sources that use the neologism are only in reference to the book, including in the references Oaktree brought. : 3 F4U (they/it) 00:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm ok with a merge. Oaktree b (talk) 00:24, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century per F4U. Makes sense. A. Randomdude0000 (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.