Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Contron Jamdo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy deleted, no useful content here. Don't be afraid to speedy tag obvious deletes, whether they exactly match a criteria or not. Friday (talk) 21:41, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Contron Jamdo
A clear case of Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Delete htonl 21:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, though I think a db-bio would've been a better choice. _-M     o     P-_  21:20, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I wondered about that, but it didn't quite seem to fit CSD A7, although it is of course an obvious deletion. Upon further reflection, though, I guess it does fall within the penumbra of A7. - htonl 21:34, 28 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.