Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial issues surrounding Adipurush


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Adipurush. Liz Read! Talk! 05:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Controversial issues surrounding Adipurush

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Beyond unnecessary article.

See WP:NOCRIT. It is unsuprising to see that a recently released movie has caused controversy. Do you really think that people will discuss these controversies in the long term? I don't know but for now, we should avoid the articles created in violation of WP:NOTNEWS. Aman Kumar Goel (Talk) 04:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. This article as written violates WP:NPOV. I might recommend WP:TNT, but there's already a section in Adipurush, and that is where this topic should be covered until such time as a split is actually needed. A merge would not be appropriate given the NPOV issues. &mdash;siro&chi;o 08:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and India. Shellwood (talk) 10:11, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Hinduism and Nepal.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 13:40, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge, or delete if there's no content that can be added. This should not be split unless there's an explicit and good reason to do so that has not been provided, and even if all content is added from this article to Adipurush, the latter article won't get worryingly long or in need of splitting. Skarmory   (talk •   contribs)  04:27, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * keep as I can add much more information and I oppose this. Well the discussion here is actually opened by an editor who has history of edit wars. Irony. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 18:07, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The addition of more information may not help much, or may even compound the issue. There seem to be all of WP:VOICE, WP:UNDUE, WP:FALSEBALANCE issues, and the article itself risks becoming a WP:COATRACK of statements prompted by the release of this film. Also, given the individuals involved, there's a real risk of the article causing WP:BLP problems. I know I'm throwing out a lot of guidelines and such here, but lastly, I think some of the signs of WP:RECENT do plague this article.   &mdash;siro&chi;o 22:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge any notable subtopics to the main article. This article does not deserve its own page. aggarwala2727 (talk) 06:22, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge Wikipedia isn’t a newspaper. Violation of WP:NOTNEWS. Don’t Get Hope And Give Up — Preceding undated comment added 06:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Merge with Adipurush: A better alternative to deleting. Kailash29792 (talk)  11:32, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep, if not, merge. I believe it is notable enough for its own page.  Chamaemelum  (  talk  ) 11:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge into Adipurush.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge relevant content needs to be combined with already existing page AdipurushAccesscrawl (talk) 15:34, 8 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.