Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversies and criticisms of Michele Bachman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was '''Speedily redirected as a POV fork. Well sourced material can be integrated into that article per content dispute resolution process''' Jclemens (talk) 23:55, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Controversies and criticisms of Michele Bachman

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Flagrant violation of WP:ATP. Given its title, its mere existence raises intractable WP:NPOV and WP:UNDUE problems - reason enough to delete the article even if the content exceeded expectations separately or collectively, which it does not. If any of this material is viable, it can and should be merged into Bachman's main article. WP:ATP advises that if an attack page's subject "is notable, but the existing page consists primarily of personal attacks against that subject and there's no good revision to revert to," it should be stubbed, especially in the context of WP:BLP; while I realize that doing so may hinder this prod, those conditions obtain here, so I have stubbed the article. The most recent previous revision can be found at. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 21:56, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.