Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversy in horse racing


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Conscious 21:26, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Controversy in horse racing

 * — (View AfD)

Heavily POV and one sided, no real references other than promotion for an animal rights organisation. DavyJonesLocker 15:39, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nasty POV. Concept articles are evil anyway and this is worse than most. WP:NOT a free webhost for animal rights propaganda. Moreschi Deletion! 16:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Horse racing is not overly long and there's no reason for this to be split off from it. Demiurge 17:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV essay cites only animal rights organizations. Add a paragraph to Horse racing but cite independent reliable sources. Edison 17:20, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge Fix POV issues and incorporate the useful information into Horse Racing. Tarinth 17:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is a POV essay espousing animal rightsd posiiton. -- Whpq 19:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV problems, but could be encorporated/merged into Horse Racing if cleaned up a bit.  SkierRMH, 00:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.