Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversy over Pluto's classification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was redirect to 2006 redefinition of planet. – Avi 02:50, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Controversy over Pluto's classification
Already covered fully in 2006 redefinition of planet and Definition of planet. └ OzLawyer / talk ┐ 01:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and redirect to first if linked in any article. Shin'ou's TTV (Futaba|Masago|Kotobuki) 01:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Agree with above, redirect. &mdash; Linnwood 01:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and/or Merge and create a redirect to Pluto. I quickly skimmed the articles and didn't see anything in this article that wasn't redundant with Pluto and 2006 redefinition of planet.  Someone might want to double-check and make sure that's the case, but I'm pretty confident we've got a fully redundant article.  --Hyperbole 01:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect (without deletion). JYolkowski // talk 02:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose, it talks about the controversy specifically, the other articles talk about Pluto the body itself and the definition of planet. That info can be shortly summarized there, with a link to this page for people who want to learn more. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Something14 (talk • contribs)
 * To the person who placed the above vote: please note it doesn't count unless you sign it. 23skidoo 04:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * This isn't a vote. Uncle G 12:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Untrue. Definition of planet has a whole section on controversies.  Why did you not consider simply adding to it? Uncle G 12:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge with Pluto anything not already stated there. That's where people will expect to find this sort of information. 23skidoo 04:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Pluto . No redirect is necessary. Michael Kinyon 08:35, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is. Redirects are inseparable parts of article merger.  Uncle G 12:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, d'uh, I blanked out for a moment. I've never actually been in favor of having merges and redirects linked, and I subconsciously (unconsciously?) substituted my preference for reality. In any case, I've changed my mind: just Redirect to Pluto. Michael Kinyon 02:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pluto. This should all be covered at the main article on the planet ... er dwarf planet ... whatever it is.  A link to 2006 redefinition of planet from Pluto basically makes this article unnecessary.--Isotope23 15:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - salvage any relevant, non-POV material for use in the three articles that already cover this issue and leave a redirect if so desired. --Ckatz chat spy  17:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete if not, then merge with Pluto and 2006 redefinition of planet. 132.205.93.148 01:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pluto - This is clearly redundant. George J. Bendo 08:28, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect to 2006 redefinition of planet. I can't find anything in this that is not already covered in other articles. --Nebular110 15:57, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV fork. Redirect not needed unless there's some pressing need in an article. Marskell 21:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't really see much to merge, but someone could merge anything they see as useful. I see no reason to maintain this as a redirect.  It's only linked from one article and I seriously doubt anyone will type "Controversy over Pluto's classification" into the search bar. Cool3 15:24, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge the last "The debate continues" Tulkolahten 22:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.