Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversation games


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nja 247 08:19, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Conversation games

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable term; I've never seen this used. While games such as "I have never" certainly exist, I've never heard the genre as a whole described as "conversation games". Ironholds (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Comment Google finds quite a number of usages of the term, although in many cases it is used in reference to foreign language teaching. Lack of sources is definitely a problem here. Looie496 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Interesting but really WP:Original research Steve Dufour (talk) 19:41, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Needs sourcing and improvement, but subject is notable with substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. It does have some variety in usage, the usages seem to be related. Can always be merged to an appropriate target if kept. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:42, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Where are these references? Ironholds (talk) 20:41, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nja 247 09:11, 1 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep Notable and referenceable topic. Edison (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.