Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conversight.ai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

Conversight.ai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Highly promotional article about a company which lacks WP:SIGCOV. Everything aside from one piece are press releases and funding announcements Praxidicae (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:37, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Note I have pruned this significantly since the nomination; cutting most (or all) of the promotional content, irrelevant or non-reliable sources, and meaningless buzzwords. I've added information from two additional sources.  There is only one press release currently cited. ~  ONUnicorn (Talk&#124;Contribs) problem solving 17:39, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * The rest are just local pieces and funding announcements, so WP:MILL applies to those imo. Praxidicae (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. There is no SIGCOV from quality RS on this company. At a WP:COMMONSENSE level, a company with under $1m in revenues is just TOOSOON (a basic 7/11 store has a higher revenue base).  Tiny companies like this who have Wikipedia articles have pieces in the WSJ or other material RS because, although small, there is deep interest in their technology.  This firm does not yet have that.  Their WP article would be the biggest plank in their notability, and it should be the other way around. Britishfinance (talk)
 * Delete per above - this is yet another instance of undisclosed paid-for spam that we see too often. I've blocked the creator for WP:UPE. MER-C 16:28, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. Thanks for that ; I forgot to mention the UPE aspect - we need a bot that scans for new users who make about 50 random small edits pver a few weeks, and then drop a +5,000 charachter fully completed article in one go from their sandbox; I see that quite often doing WP:NPP, and most seem like WP:UPE cases to me. Britishfinance (talk) 16:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.