Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convey (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.-- Kubigula (talk) 22:22, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Convey (band)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The band claims notability as one of the first bands to license their music under Creative Commons, which I don't think is sufficient. They have one interview in Red Hat magazine (online), which I also don't think is sufficient. NawlinWiki (talk) 10:54, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. the primary assertion here is based on ..notable for being one of the first American rock bands to be licensed under Creative Commons.. I don't see that meets any of the criteria at WP:MUSIC. Pedro : Chat  12:11, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 00:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * I have searched for sources in Google News archives here, and also checked in a library database of newspaper and magazine articles, but found nothing. Delete if no third-party sources (beyond Red Hat magazine) are forthcoming by the end of the deletion discussion. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.