Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Convoy Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Kearny Mesa. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-11 05:32Z 

Convoy Street

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't see how a street with no stated historical associations is notable enough for its own page on wikipedia. Some of the information could be merged into the neighbourhood article (Kearny Mesa) but even then it would be adding unverified material. Any opinions people? Madmedea 15:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with nom, no assertion of notability.--CastAStone|(talk) 16:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge to the main neighbourhood article, as this is the usual practice for non-notable streets and housing estates. Walton monarchist89 18:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see that there is much here to merge.  What is in the article appears to be both original research and directory information.-- Kubigula (talk) 21:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.