Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cony Soft


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. A few hits actually come up under "conysoft", rather than "cony soft", but it's might thin. I'm also not a big fan of listing the names of several people and more or less stating that they're engaged in a crime. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  22:51, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Cony Soft

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Okay, the Cony Soft article has no references or sources according to the big citation block at the top of the article. There's no proof that Cony has connections with Waixing, Super Game or Hummer Team and I believe someone just made this up. Share your thoughts on this page. --Burai (talk) 11:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails basic WP:V policy. Marasmusine (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - it's one of the better known pirate companies. I mean, the games they made can be found extensively on YouTube. Paul 1953 (talk) 12:19, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 03:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Nothin', which fails notability per the lack of reliable secondary sourcing. --Izno (talk) 03:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.