Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coochie rolls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy deleted as nonsense/vandalism, NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:19, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Coochie rolls

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Non-notable. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:00, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * My first reaction, upon reading the article, was "No, it does not.". My second reaction, upon reading the edit history, was to wonder what StephenBuxton was referring to.  Because my searches don't turn up any such thing.  This is just completely unverifiable.  Reality is, in stark contrast to this article, that this is a song title, for a song that hasn't been documented by the world at large, by a band that, as far as I can tell, hasn't been documented by the world at large either. Uncle G (talk) 07:51, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * comment This was nominated for speedy deletion as Vandalism, and a quick google search of "Coochie rolls" showed up enough hits to indicate that it probably wasn't(eg ). I agree that there probably isn't enough material out there to make it notable, and it will probably fail AFD.  But "probably" doesn't cut it as a candidate for speedy deletion (with the exception of BLP, of course). That was why I suggested PROD/AFD/Improve. Stephen! Coming... 09:18, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * You also said that it appears to be accurate. I wondered what you found because I cannot find anything that confirms the accuracy of either sentence here. Uncle G (talk) 15:33, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable. And since when is a non-notable song by a non-notable MySpace band a reliable source for such expressions and their inclusion in an encyclopedia? Drmies (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete this definition of a neologism. Lady  of  Shalott  18:21, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions.  —  Lady  of  Shalott  18:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.