Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coodle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:38, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Coodle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatantly WP:PROMO for something with a lot of sources but still questionable WP:GNG given that, first of all, several of the links point to the SAME story as shared in multiple sources (following "seen on" in some of these shows the same thing at 4 of the links), and quite a few of the rest appear to be paid placements all at the same time in British media. JamesG5 (talk) 10:03, 24 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep before anyone come up with COI tag, well, no personal or indirect link to company or anything. I created article just to contribute. I appreciate JamesG5 for initiating the discussion. I'm waiting how the discussion pan out.GyllenhalMike (talk) 10:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - notability appears to be borderline at best - it relies on tabloids such as The Sun, which are not suitable sources for Wikipedia articles, and per the nom there may be some sort of paid placement issue going on with several of the "stories" covering this. Furthermore, the article itself looks very promotional in nature so at the very least needs a WP:TNT I would say - it reads like a company brochure advertising the product, rather than a neutrally-written encyclopedia article. I hope this won't discourage, who is welcomed to Wikipedia and can hopefully become a regular contributor. But my advice to get started here would be to read Help:Your first article and begin with something more mainstream and encyclopedic than this somewhat niche pillow product. Cheers &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 10:31, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete For the same reasons that have already been given. Questionable sourcing and written like an advert. Although, I don't think it is necessarily the fault of the creator in this case. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Acknowledged :) GyllenhalMike (talk) 03:51, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SIGCOV. It's not like My Pillow or even IKEA pillows on that sense. It's a good faith effort. Bearian (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.