Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CookieQ


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 19:13, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

CookieQ

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreferenced article about a non-notable software product. Prod was removed without explanation, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 17:39, 22 January 2012 (UTC) CookieQ has been linked to as the first of only 3 innovative tools highlighted in a post by European Vice President Neelie Kroes. Furthermore, it is the only one that is a universal off-the-shelf client side solution. More evidence will be presented later this week. In the UK the deadline for compliance with the cookie law is May 2012 and CookieQ is the only off-the-shelf product designed for SMEs that is available.
 * This page should not be deleted because...

Here is page that links to CookieQ

"Others have started to offer various tools or services they say help businesses to comply with e-Privacy obligations on cookies (just to pick some random examples: here, here or here). While it is not for me to endorse any particular tool or service, I applaud this overall development, which is bringing some genuine innovation;"

http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/neelie-kroes/donottrack/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tartanlass (talk • contribs) 18:21, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete- mention referenced above is trivial, and product has no other notability. A412  (Talk * C) 18:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable - Frankie1969 (talk) 02:37, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 12:48, 23 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Non-notable back-office product. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 21:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.