Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cookprint


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Killiondude (talk) 05:32, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Cookprint

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable neologism: appears in a dictionary website in 2008 as a "buzzword" but evidently didn't catch on - no evidence of usage over the last 10 years. Article is just a dictionary definition. Redirect to Wiktionary. Pam D  12:08, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Here in the LA Times the authors speaks about the the ethics of eating, refering to the term "cookprint". Isn't it an evidance of notabilty?

link to the source: http://www.latimes.com/food/la-fo-ethics-eating22-2009apr22-story.html Lidiia Kondratieva (talk) 12:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

and here we have some general meaning of the term, not related to cooking. Link: https://www.collinsdictionary.com/submission/10666/CookprintLidiia Kondratieva (talk) 12:21, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America1000 12:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. The notability of the subject isn't established by the cited references.  Having to resort to pointing to an unapproved user-submitted definition at an online dictionary doesn't help the case.  TimBuck2 (talk) 22:02, 25 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.