Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cool Math


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 03:32, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Cool Math

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It didn't have any in-depth hits in several database and custom Google searches. Are there any secondary source articles that discuss the site at all? There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar 15:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  czar  15:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  15:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete I can't find anything beyond mentions in reliable sources. Sam Walton (talk) 15:04, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably. I consider myself new because I rarely edit Wikipedia, but I see the problem with my article. I though it might be safe because of Cool Math Game's Alexa rank, but I guess not. The Amazing Matt (talk) 15:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm withholding my decision for the moment. Because of the commonality of the name, the searches are a bit onerous. However, in the first several pages of News I've seen a couple of hits, several by a site called KpopStarz (including the one already in the article), but also this mention, Newsday, and STLtoday.com. I think if the article creator can do some research, they might find enough to show it meets either WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. And that search was simply on the main "Cool Math" moniker.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:14, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * FYI, KpopStarz isn't a reliable source, they run stories on all sorts of crap. Sam Walton (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete David Condrey   log talk  23:27, 16 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.