Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooley'd


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete. – ABCDe ✉ 19:13, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Cooley'd
Nonsense... this isn't urbandictionary! Kareeser|Talk! 03:17, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NFT. Utter garbage.  Dbtfz (talk - contribs) 03:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete That phenomenon has less to do with Cooley and more to do with quality of service issues. ;-) Ruby 03:27, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per CSD A6. -- Nacon Kantari  e |t||c|m 03:55, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - unverifiable, non-notable, unstable neologism, i.e. protologism; Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. - Hillel 06:07, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly non-notable neologism. J I P  | Talk 06:29, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Naconkantari. Only one entry in UrbanDictionary, and even if there are more, Wikipedia is WP:NOT a slang usage guide. SYCTHOS talk  00:03, 27 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.